Insight cloud

OCI Object Storage vs AWS S3:AWS vs OCI

Written by

DevOps Tech Guy

in

A Clear Comparison of Bucket Services

When it comes to cloud storage, buckets are the foundation. Whether you are storing images, logs, backups, or large datasets, bucket-based storage services make it easy to organize and retrieve your files. Two of the most popular cloud providers—Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon Web Services (AWS)—offer bucket services with similar goals but different implementations. In this blog, we’ll compare OCI Object Storage and AWS S3 bucket services in detail.

1. Basic Concept of Buckets

  • AWS S3 Buckets: In AWS, a bucket is a container where objects (files) are stored. Each object can be accessed using a unique URL formed by combining the bucket name and object key. Buckets are globally unique across AWS.
  • OCI Buckets: In OCI, buckets are also containers for objects. However, buckets exist within a compartment (a logical grouping of resources). Each bucket belongs to a namespace, which makes bucket names unique only inside that namespace (not globally).

Key Difference:

  • AWS → Global uniqueness of bucket names.
  • OCI → Bucket names unique within a namespace.

2. Namespace and Global Scope

  • AWS: Every bucket name is part of a global namespace. If someone already took the bucket name my-data, you cannot use it in any AWS region.
  • OCI: Each account has a unique namespace string (like an identifier). Bucket names only need to be unique within your namespace. This avoids conflicts with other customers.

This makes OCI more flexible for naming, while AWS enforces stricter uniqueness.

3. Storage Classes

  • AWS S3: Offers multiple storage classes:
    • Standard (frequent access)
    • Standard-IA (infrequent access)
    • One Zone-IA (cheaper, one zone only)
    • Glacier / Glacier Deep Archive (cold storage)
  • OCI Object Storage: Uses only two main tiers:
    • Standard (frequent access)
    • Archive (infrequent, long-term storage, similar to Glacier).

AWS has more storage class options, giving fine-grained cost optimization. OCI keeps it simple with just two.

4. Access and Security

  • AWS: Uses IAM (Identity and Access Management) for permissions. Bucket policies, ACLs, and IAM roles define who can access buckets. You can also use S3 Block Public Access to prevent accidental public exposure.
  • OCI: Uses IAM Policies at the compartment level. Policies are written in a human-readable language (e.g., “Allow group Analysts to read buckets in compartment ProjectX”). Bucket-level access control can also be set using Pre-Authenticated Requests.

AWS offers more granular tools (bucket policies + ACLs), while OCI emphasizes simplicity through compartment-based access.

5. Data Consistency

  • AWS S3: Provides read-after-write consistency for new objects and eventual consistency for overwrite or delete operations.
  • OCI Object Storage: Provides strong consistency for all operations—meaning once an object is written or deleted, every subsequent request reflects the change immediately.

OCI offers stronger guarantees here, which is important for transactional systems.

6. Pricing Model

  • AWS S3: Pricing is region-dependent and broken down into:
    • Storage cost (per GB/month)
    • Request cost (per 1,000 PUT, GET, DELETE, etc.)
    • Data transfer cost (in/out).
  • OCI Object Storage: Similar breakdown but generally cheaper than AWS for storage and request costs, especially for Archive tier. Oracle often markets this as a cost advantage.

AWS may be more expensive but has a broader ecosystem. OCI focuses on competitive pricing.

7. Integration and Ecosystem

  • AWS S3: Deeply integrated with almost every AWS service (Lambda, EC2, CloudFront, Athena, Glue, etc.), making it a central part of AWS’s ecosystem.
  • OCI Object Storage: Integrates with OCI services (Compute, Data Science, Autonomous Database, etc.) and supports S3 API compatibility for easy migration from AWS.

AWS has a richer ecosystem, but OCI provides an easier migration path for customers already using S3 APIs.

8. Unique Features

  • AWS S3:
    • Versioning for object history.
    • Cross-region replication.
    • Object Lock (for immutability).
    • Event Notifications.
  • OCI Object Storage:
    • Pre-Authenticated Requests (PAR): Allows creating a unique URL for an object or bucket without requiring an IAM user.
    • Strong consistency guarantee (unique advantage).

Conclusion

Both AWS S3 and OCI Object Storage offer reliable, scalable bucket services. The choice depends on your needs:

  • Choose AWS S3 if:
    • You want a mature ecosystem with deep integrations.
    • You need multiple storage classes for fine cost control.
    • You are already invested in AWS services.
  • Choose OCI Object Storage if:
    • You want simpler, cheaper storage pricing.
    • You prefer strong consistency guarantees.
    • You like flexibility in bucket naming via namespaces.

In short: AWS S3 = Ecosystem + Options, OCI = Simplicity + Cost Efficiency + Strong Consistency

Next Steps :

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts